Other countries repealed theirs
Most countries that had a wealth tax have since scrapped it, which proves the policy fails in practice.
- 3 counters
- 8 sources
- 2 people
- 3 evidence
The case for taxing wealth, argument by argument.
Most countries that had a wealth tax have since scrapped it, which proves the policy fails in practice.
You're making the "Other countries repealed theirs" argument against a wealth tax. The taxes that were repealed had low thresholds, leaky exemptions and poor enforcement — the failures were of design, not of the underlying idea. The feared mass exodus didn't materialise either: empirical studies of existing wealth and high-income taxes find emigration responses are modest, and well-designed exit rules limit avoidance. And plenty of countries — including the UK — already tax wealth by other names (inheritance tax, stamp duty, council tax) without controversy. Fix the design and it works. Learn more: https://wealthtax.now/arguments/repealed-elsewhere/
You're making the "Other countries repealed theirs" argument against a wealth tax. Those taxes failed by design — low thresholds, leaky exemptions — not in principle. Most countries already tax wealth by other names anyway. https://wealthtax.now/arguments/repealed-elsewhere/
Cross-border sheltering is a design problem that's already being solved. Since the Common Reporting Standard began automatically swapping bank data between countries, jurisdictions have identified about €107 billion in extra tax, interest and penalties from voluntary compliance, and in 2022 alone information was exchanged on 123 million accounts worth €12 trillion. Independent research (Boas et al., 2024) finds automatic exchange cut the offshore tax gap by roughly 70%. "They'll just hide it abroad" describes a loophole that enforcement has largely closed, not an inevitability.
Using UK tax records and a reform that sharply raised tax on the foreign income of the super-rich, emigration of the affected wealthy rose only temporarily — by about six percentage points from a base of roughly 5% — before reverting to its pre-reform level. Despite headlines about an "exodus of millionaires", the actual tax data showed minimal emigration, and those who stayed raised their reported income and income tax by around 50%. The capital-flight threat is far smaller than claimed.
Recurring net-wealth taxes are an established, documented instrument: twelve OECD countries levied one in 1990, and France, Norway, Spain and Switzerland still did in 2017 — sitting alongside the inheritance, estate, transfer and recurring property taxes that nearly every member already runs. Taxing accumulated wealth is the norm, not a radical departure; "tax something else, not wealth" overlooks that governments tax wealth already.
“A lot of the work that we've done over the last few years has been to study the historical experience with wealth taxation. In many countries like France, Germa”
Raised as a counter-argument to rebut. “And if you want to find examples of wealth taxes that are designed badly, you will find them.”
Raised as a counter-argument to rebut. “It was done in the 20th century. It was done in the 20th century, inequality was reduced massively and we should look at how they did that.”
“wealth taxes have been tried in a number of countries. Only Switzerland has stuck with it. ... But most countries have abandoned them”
Raised as a counter-argument to rebut. “if taxing wealth is so easy, why doesn't anybody do it? And he showed that, you know, across the world, wealth taxation is quite low.”
Raised as a counter-argument to rebut. “all of the downsides to wealth taxes the fact that they're almost everywhere that they've been tried they've specifically”
Raised as a counter-argument to rebut. “when people say it's impossible i always say well actually we did it we did it if you study a bit of history you'll see after the second world war basically all”
“the vast majority of companies that have introduced wealth taxes have later abandoned them which is a pretty strong indicator that they don't work”